{"id":3763,"date":"2023-03-17T23:24:24","date_gmt":"2023-03-17T22:24:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/?page_id=3763"},"modified":"2026-02-07T17:20:12","modified_gmt":"2026-02-07T16:20:12","slug":"help-risk-metrics","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/","title":{"rendered":"Help – Risk Metrics"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tRisk Metrics\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>
\n
\n\t

In investment, risk metrics are quantitative measures used to evaluate and manage the potential risks associated with investing in various assets. These metrics help investors understand the level of risk they are taking on and make informed decisions about their investment portfolio.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Performance and Risk Analysis<\/h3>
\n\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGetting Started \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Define Investment Objectives<\/strong><\/p>\n

The investment process begins by interpreting portfolio objectives within the system\u2019s analytical context. Objectives such as capital preservation, income generation, or growth define how risk metrics should be read. A conservative mandate prioritizes drawdown control and downside risk measures, while a growth-oriented mandate places greater emphasis on return efficiency metrics. Without this contextual frame, risk indicators such as volatility or Value at Risk may be misinterpreted, leading to decisions that conflict with the intended investment profile.<\/p>\n

Anchor Performance Analysis to a Benchmark Reference<\/strong><\/p>\n

Benchmark alignment provides the reference point against which all performance and risk outcomes are evaluated. Metrics like alpha, beta, tracking error, and information ratio only gain meaning when interpreted relative to a benchmark. The system\u2019s benchmark comparison clarifies whether performance results from market exposure or active management decisions, guiding whether portfolio changes should target asset selection, factor exposure, or strategic allocation.<\/p>\n

Interpret Return Metrics in Relation to Time and Consistency<\/strong><\/p>\n

Return metrics summarize how the portfolio has performed across time, but their real value lies in consistency analysis. A strong cumulative or annualized return can mask uneven performance or short periods of extreme gains. Examining return stability over multiple horizons helps identify whether results stem from sustainable investment logic or episodic market conditions. This interpretation informs expectations about future performance persistence.<\/p>\n

Analyze Volatility as an Indicator of Return Reliability<\/strong><\/p>\n

Volatility measures quantify the dispersion of returns and signal the reliability of performance outcomes. Elevated volatility indicates greater uncertainty around expected returns, which affects position sizing and portfolio confidence. Rather than treating volatility as a standalone risk indicator, the system enables users to evaluate whether return levels adequately compensate for observed variability, shaping risk-return tradeoff decisions.<\/p>\n

Examine Downside Deviation and Loss Sensitivity<\/strong><\/p>\n

Downside-focused metrics refine the understanding of risk by isolating unfavorable outcomes. Downside deviation and semi-variance emphasize losses relative to a threshold, offering insight into how often and how severely the portfolio underperforms expectations. These metrics are especially relevant when protecting capital or meeting liability-driven objectives, where avoiding losses matters more than maximizing upside variability.<\/p>\n

Evaluate Maximum Drawdown and Recovery Behavior<\/strong><\/p>\n

Maximum drawdown reveals the most severe peak-to-trough loss experienced during the evaluation period. Beyond the drawdown magnitude, its duration and recovery speed provide insight into portfolio resilience. Large or prolonged drawdowns may indicate structural vulnerabilities or excessive concentration, prompting reassessment of diversification or exposure limits.<\/p>\n

Assess Tail Risk Through Probabilistic Loss Measures<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tail risk metrics such as Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall quantify the probability and severity of extreme losses. These metrics shift analysis from average outcomes to stress scenarios, supporting decisions related to capital buffers, leverage, and defensive positioning. Expected Shortfall, in particular, highlights losses beyond the VaR threshold, improving awareness of catastrophic risk exposure.<\/p>\n

Interpret Risk-Adjusted Performance Ratios Holistically<\/strong><\/p>\n

Risk-adjusted ratios synthesize return and risk into comparable efficiency measures. The Sharpe ratio evaluates excess return per unit of total risk, while the Sortino ratio isolates downside risk efficiency. The Omega ratio examines the entire return distribution rather than relying on moments. Interpreting these metrics together prevents overreliance on a single definition of risk and reveals whether performance efficiency is robust across different perspectives.<\/p>\n

Analyze Market Sensitivity and Systematic Risk Exposure<\/strong><\/p>\n

Beta and related metrics quantify how strongly the portfolio responds to market movements. A high beta portfolio amplifies market trends, while a low beta portfolio dampens them. Understanding systematic exposure clarifies whether portfolio risk stems from intentional market positioning or unintended sensitivity, guiding adjustments in defensive or opportunistic environments.<\/p>\n

Evaluate Diversification Through Correlation and Dependency<\/strong><\/p>\n

Correlation analysis exposes relationships between portfolio components and the extent to which diversification reduces risk. Low or negative correlations enhance portfolio stability, while rising correlations during stress periods may erode diversification benefits. Monitoring correlation dynamics supports informed asset allocation and guards against hidden concentration risk.<\/p>\n

Integrate Metrics Into Forward-Looking Investment Judgement<\/strong><\/p>\n

Metrics reach their highest value when synthesized into a coherent investment narrative. Rather than optimizing individual indicators, the system supports integrating volatility, drawdown, tail risk, and performance efficiency into forward-looking judgments about risk tolerance, capital deployment, and strategic positioning. Decisions are driven by consistency across metrics rather than isolated extremes.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>

Performance and Risk Metrics<\/h3>
\n\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReturn\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Return is a measure of the profit or loss generated by an investment over a specific period of time. It is expressed as a percentage and is calculated by subtracting the initial investment amount from the final investment value and dividing the result by the initial investment amount.<\/p>\n

Annualized return is a measure of the average rate of return earned by an investment over a specific period of time, usually one year. It is calculated by taking the total return of an investment over the given period, adjusting it for the number of years, and expressing it as an annual percentage rate. The Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), also known as geometric mean return, is a way to calculate the annualized return of an investment over a period of time. It is a measure of the average rate at which an investment has grown, taking into account the effect of compounding. The CAGR is determined by finding the value that, if compounded at the same rate over the investment horizon, would result in the same final value as the actual investment.<\/p>\n

Cumulative return is a measure of the total return generated by an investment over a specific period of time. It reflects the total amount of profit or loss earned by an investor on an investment, taking into account both capital gains and income over the entire holding period.<\/p>\n

All three measures are useful for evaluating investment performance, but they provide different perspectives on the investment's performance. Return provides a snapshot of an investment's performance over a specific period, while annualized return provides a standardized measure of the investment's average performance over multiple periods. Cumulative return provides a measure of the total profit or loss generated by the investment over the entire holding period.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tVolatility\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\tVolatility is a statistical measure of the degree of variation or dispersion of returns for a particular investment or portfolio over a given period of time. In finance, volatility is often used as a proxy for risk, as more volatile assets are generally considered riskier than less volatile assets. Volatility can be measured using several different metrics, but one commonly used measure is standard deviation. Standard deviation measures the degree to which returns deviate from their average over a given time period.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCorrelation\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\tCorrelation between assets refers to the measure of the relationship between the returns of two or more assets in a portfolio. It is a statistical measure that ranges from -1 to +1, where a correlation of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, a correlation of +1 indicates a perfect positive correlation, and a correlation of 0 indicates no correlation between the two assets.\n\nWhen two assets have a positive correlation, it means that the returns of both assets tend to move in the same direction, either up or down. For example, if the returns of two stocks have a positive correlation, it means that when one stock goes up in value, the other stock is also likely to go up in value. Conversely, when one stock goes down in value, the other stock is also likely to go down in value.\n\nWhen two assets have a negative correlation, it means that the returns of both assets tend to move in opposite directions. For example, if the returns of a stock and a bond have a negative correlation, it means that when the stock goes up in value, the bond is likely to go down in value, and vice versa.\n\nThe degree of correlation between two assets can have important implications for portfolio management. If two assets have a high positive correlation, it may not provide sufficient diversification benefits in a portfolio, as they are likely to move together. In contrast, if two assets have a low or negative correlation, it can help to reduce the overall risk of a portfolio, as they are likely to move in opposite directions, thus providing diversification benefits.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAnnualization Factor\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The annualization factor is a number used to convert an investment return or volatility figure from a shorter time period into an annualized rate of return or volatility figure. It is used to compare investments that have different holding periods on a common basis, as well as to estimate the potential returns and risks of an investment over a full year. To calculate the annualization factor based on trading days, we first need to determine the number of trading days in a year for the particular market or asset being analyzed. For example, the New York Stock Exchange has approximately 252 trading days per year.<\/p>\n

The annualization factor is useful for comparing the performance of investments that have different holding periods, but it is important to note that it assumes a constant rate of return or volatility over the full year, which may not be the case. Therefore, investors should use annualized figures as a guide and not rely on them exclusively for decision-making.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tMaximum Drawdown\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Maximum drawdown (MDD) is a measure of the largest loss an investment portfolio has experienced from a peak value to a trough value, before it returns to the previous peak. In other words, it is the maximum percentage decline from the highest point of the portfolio to the lowest point.<\/p>\n

Maximum drawdown is a useful measure for investors because it provides an idea of the portfolio's risk and potential loss during adverse market conditions. A higher maximum drawdown indicates that the portfolio has a higher risk of experiencing large losses in the future.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDownside Deviation\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\tDownside deviation is a risk measurement metric that focuses on the volatility of negative returns and it is used to evaluate the downside risk of an investment or portfolio. To calculate downside deviation, first a threshold return is established. This threshold represents the minimum acceptable return or the amount of risk an investor is willing to tolerate. Then, the difference between each negative return and the threshold return is squared, summed and averaged, and the square root of that average is taken to obtain the downside deviation.\n\nDownside deviation is a useful metric because it captures the risk of losses, or the volatility of returns that are less than the threshold, while ignoring the volatility of returns that exceed the threshold. It is especially important for investors who are more concerned with protecting their capital against losses than maximizing their returns.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tValue at Risk\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Value at Risk (VaR) and Historical Value at Risk (HVaR) are both risk management tools used in finance to estimate the potential loss of an investment or portfolio.<\/p>\n

VaR is a statistical measure that estimates the potential loss of an investment or portfolio over a given time horizon, with a specified level of confidence. VaR is calculated based on historical data and uses statistical methods to estimate the potential loss that may occur within a given time frame and level of confidence.<\/p>\n

HVaR, on the other hand, is based solely on historical data. It estimates the potential loss of an investment or portfolio over a given time horizon, based on the worst-case scenario loss observed in the past. HVaR provides a more conservative estimate of risk, as it assumes that future market conditions will be similar to those in the past.<\/p>\n

The Modified VaR is an extension of the traditional VaR calculation that takes into account the skewness and kurtosis of the distribution of returns, which can be important in portfolios with non-normal return distributions. The modified VaR adjusts for these characteristics of the distribution by applying a correction factor to the traditional VaR calculation.<\/p>\n

At a 95% level of confidence, VaR provide an estimate of the potential loss that may occur within a certain time frame with 95% certainty. VaR at 95% confidence level means that there is a 5% chance that the actual loss may exceed the estimated VaR. For example, if a portfolio has a 95% VaR of $10,000 over the next month, this means that there is a 5% chance that the actual loss may be greater than $10,000.<\/p>\n

Overall, both VaR and HVaR are important risk management tools used by investors and portfolio managers to evaluate the potential downside risk of an investment or portfolio. VaR is a more commonly used tool due to its flexibility and ability to take into account changing market conditions, while HVaR is useful for identifying the worst-case scenario based on past performance.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tExpected Shortfall\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Expected Shortfall (ES) is a risk management tool used in finance to estimate the potential losses of an investment or portfolio beyond the Value at Risk (VaR) estimate, assuming that the loss exceeds the VaR threshold. ES is also known as Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) or Tail VaR.<\/p>\n

Historical Expected Shortfall (HES) is based on historical data and estimates the average potential loss that may occur beyond the VaR threshold. HES is calculated based on the average of the losses that exceed the VaR threshold observed in the past.<\/p>\n

Both ES and HES provide investors and portfolio managers with a more comprehensive estimate of potential losses, taking into account the tail risk beyond the VaR estimate. For example, if the VaR at a 95% confidence level for a particular investment or portfolio is $10,000 over the next month, the ES or HES estimate would provide an estimate of the potential losses that exceed this threshold, assuming that they occur.<\/p>\n

Overall, ES and HES are useful risk management tools that provide a more complete picture of potential losses, especially in situations where the VaR estimate may not be sufficient. However, like VaR and HVaR, ES and HES are estimates and not guarantees, and actual losses may exceed these estimates.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSharpe Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\tThe Sharpe ratio is a risk-adjusted performance metric that measures the return generated by an investment per unit of risk taken and used to evaluate the performance of an investment or a portfolio. The Sharpe ratio is calculated by dividing the average Return by the standard deviation of the investment or portfolio's returns.\n
    \n \t
  • Sharpe Ratio = Average Return \/ Standard Deviation of Returns<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nA higher Sharpe ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted performance, as it means that the investment or portfolio has generated higher returns for the amount of risk taken. Conversely, a lower Sharpe ratio indicates that the investment or portfolio has generated lower returns for the amount of risk taken.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCalmar Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t

    The Calmar Ratio is a risk-adjusted performance metric that compares an investment's average return to its maximum drawdown over a specific period of time. The Calmar Ratio is calculated by dividing the average return of an investment by its maximum drawdown, which is the maximum percentage decline from the investment's highest value.<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Calmar Ratio = Average Return \/ Maximum Drawdown<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      A higher Calmar Ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted performance, as it means that the investment has generated higher returns relative to the size of its drawdowns. Conversely, a lower Calmar Ratio indicates that the investment has generated lower returns relative to the size of its drawdowns.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

      \n\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSterling Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t

      The Sterling Ratio is a risk-adjusted performance metric that measures the average return generated by an investment per unit of downside risk taken. The Sterling Ratio is calculated by dividing the average return of the investment or portfolio by its average drawdown.<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Sterling Ratio = Average Return \/ Average Drawdown<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        A higher Sterling Ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted performance, as it means that the investment or portfolio has generated higher returns relative to the size of its downside risk. Conversely, a lower Sterling Ratio indicates that the investment or portfolio has generated lower returns relative to the size of its downside risk.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

        \n\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tOmega Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t

        The Omega Ratio is a risk-adjusted performance metric that measures the probability-weighted ratio of gains to losses for an investment or portfolio. The Omega Ratio is calculated by dividing the probability-weighted average of positive returns by the probability-weighted average of negative returns.<\/p>\n

          \n
        • Omega Ratio = Probability-Weighted Average of Positive Returns \/ Probability-Weighted Average of Negative Returns<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          A higher Omega Ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted performance, as it means that the investment or portfolio has generated higher returns relative to its downside risk. Conversely, a lower Omega Ratio indicates that the investment or portfolio has generated lower returns relative to its downside risk.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

          \n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSortino Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t

          The Sortino Ratio is a risk-adjusted performance metric that measures the return generated by an investment or portfolio per unit of downside risk taken. The Sortino Ratio is calculated by dividing the return of the investment or portfolio by its downside deviation,<\/p>\n

            \n
          • Sortino Ratio = Average Return \/ Downside Deviation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            A higher Sortino Ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted performance, as it means that the investment or portfolio has generated higher returns relative to the size of its downside risk. Conversely, a lower Sortino Ratio indicates that the investment or portfolio has generated lower returns relative to the size of its downside risk.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

            \n\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tUpside-Potential Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t

            The Upside Potential Ratio (UPR) is a risk-adjusted performance metric that measures the potential upside of an investment relative to its potential downside. The UPR is calculated by dividing the expected upside return of an investment by its expected downside return.<\/p>\n

              \n
            • UPR = (Expected Upside Return \/ Expected Downside Return)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              A higher UPR indicates a better risk-adjusted performance, as it means that the investment has higher potential upside relative to its potential downside. Conversely, a lower UPR indicates that the investment has lower potential upside relative to its potential downside.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTail Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t

              The Tail Ratio measures the ratio of the average returns of the portfolio during extreme negative events (i.e. in the left tail of the return distribution) to the average returns of the portfolio during normal market conditions.<\/p>\n

              A higher tail ratio indicates that the portfolio performs relatively worse during extreme negative events, which suggests that the portfolio may be more exposed to tail risk. In contrast, a lower tail ratio indicates that the portfolio performs relatively better during extreme negative events, which suggests that the portfolio may be more resilient to tail risk.<\/p>\n

              Tail ratio is determined by using quantiles of the return distribution. Specifically, the tail ratio is the ratio of the average returns in the lower tail of the distribution to the average returns in the upper tail of the distribution, usually measured at specific quantiles, such as the 5th and 95th percentiles.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStability\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t

              In finance, time series stability refers to the consistency and predictability of a financial time series over time.<\/p>\n

              R-squared, also known as the coefficient of determination, is a statistical measure that represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable (in this case, the cumulative returns of a time series) that is explained by the independent variable (usually time). In the context of time series analysis, R-squared can be used to estimate the stability of a time series over time.<\/p>\n

              To determine time series stability using R-squared, a linear regression model is first fitted to the cumulative returns of the time series data. The R-squared value of the linear fit is then calculated. If the R-squared value is close to 1, this indicates that the linear fit explains a large proportion of the variance in the cumulative returns, which suggests that the time series is relatively stable. On the other hand, if the R-squared value is low, this indicates that the linear fit explains only a small proportion of the variance in the cumulative returns, which suggests that the time series may be more unstable.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReturn Distribution\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\tReturn distribution refers to the pattern of returns observed in a particular investment or portfolio over a given period of time. It is a statistical measure of the frequency and magnitude of returns, which can help investors and portfolio managers in evaluating the risk and return characteristics of an investment.\n\nReturn distribution can be represented graphically using a histogram, which shows the frequency of returns in different ranges, or using a probability density function (PDF), which shows the probability of returns falling within a certain range.\n\nCommon statistical measures used to describe return distribution include mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis. These measures can help in evaluating the shape of the return distribution, as well as the degree of variability and asymmetry in the returns.\n\nUnderstanding return distribution is important in managing risk and constructing a well-diversified portfolio that meets the investor's risk and return objectives. It can help in identifying the range of potential returns and the likelihood of experiencing positive or negative returns, which can inform investment decisions and risk management strategies.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStress Events\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t

              Stress Events<\/strong> represent historical market shock scenarios used to evaluate portfolio performance around periods of extreme market stress.<\/p>\n

              Returns<\/strong> are presented for multiple horizons relative to the stress event date. -3M<\/strong> and -1M<\/strong> returns reflect portfolio performance three and one month before the event, highlighting conditions leading into the stress period. +1M<\/strong>, +3M<\/strong>, and +6M<\/strong> returns show performance after the event, capturing the immediate impact and subsequent recovery behavior.<\/p>\n

              Maximum Drawdown (MDD)<\/strong> measures the largest peak-to-trough loss over each time horizon. -3M MDD<\/strong> and -1M MDD<\/strong> indicate drawdowns prior to the stress event, while +1M<\/strong>, +3M<\/strong>, +6M<\/strong>, and +1Y MDD<\/strong> assess the severity and persistence of losses during and after the event. Together, these metrics provide a concise view of downside risk, capital impact, and recovery characteristics under stressed market conditions.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>

              Benchmark Comparison<\/h3>
              \n\t
              \n\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAlpha and Beta\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t

              Alpha and beta are two important measures used in finance to evaluate the performance of an investment or portfolio relative to a benchmark index.<\/p>\n

              Beta measures the volatility of an investment or portfolio relative to the benchmark index. A beta of 1 indicates that the investment or portfolio is as volatile as the benchmark, while a beta greater than 1 indicates higher volatility and a beta less than 1 indicates lower volatility. For example, if the beta of an investment or portfolio is 1.2, this means that it is 20% more volatile than the benchmark index.<\/p>\n

              Alpha, on the other hand, measures the excess return of an investment or portfolio relative to the expected return based on its beta. A positive alpha indicates that the investment or portfolio has outperformed the benchmark index, while a negative alpha indicates underperformance. For example, if the expected return of an investment or portfolio based on its beta is 8% and the actual return is 10%, the alpha would be 2%.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tInformation Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\tInformation ratio is a financial performance measure that evaluates the risk-adjusted return of an investment or portfolio relative to a benchmark index. It is calculated by dividing the excess return of the investment or portfolio over the benchmark index by the tracking error, which measures the deviation of the investment or portfolio returns from the benchmark index returns.\n\nThe information ratio is a useful tool for investors and portfolio managers to evaluate the skill of a portfolio manager in generating excess returns relative to the benchmark index, while taking into account the level of risk involved. A higher information ratio indicates that the portfolio manager is generating greater excess returns for the level of risk taken, while a lower information ratio indicates the opposite.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTreynor Ratio\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t

              The Treynor ratio, also known as the reward-to-volatility ratio, is a financial performance measure that evaluates the risk-adjusted return of an investment or portfolio relative to the systematic risk or beta. It is calculated by dividing the excess return of the investment or portfolio over the risk-free rate by the beta.<\/p>\n

              The Treynor ratio is useful in evaluating the performance of an investment or portfolio relative to the systematic risk taken, rather than the overall risk. A higher Treynor ratio indicates that the investment or portfolio is generating greater excess returns for the level of systematic risk taken, while a lower Treynor ratio indicates the opposite.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t

              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tActive Return\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\tActive return, also known as active management return, is a measure of the excess return of an investment or portfolio relative to a benchmark index. It is calculated by subtracting the benchmark return from the actual return of the investment or portfolio.\n\nActive return is an important measure for investors and portfolio managers who use active management strategies, which involve making investment decisions based on analysis and forecasting, rather than simply tracking a benchmark index. Active return can help in evaluating the success of these strategies by measuring the additional return generated by active management.\n\nA positive active return indicates that the investment or portfolio has outperformed the benchmark index, while a negative active return indicates underperformance. However, it is important to consider the level of risk taken to generate the excess return, as higher risk can also lead to higher returns. Therefore, active return should be used in conjunction with other performance measures, such as risk-adjusted return, to fully evaluate the performance of an investment or portfolio.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTracking Error\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\tTracking error is a financial performance measure that evaluates the deviation of an investment or portfolio's returns from its benchmark index. It is calculated by taking the standard deviation of the difference between the returns of the investment or portfolio and the returns of the benchmark index over a certain time period.\n\nTracking error is an important measure for investors and portfolio managers who use passive management strategies, which involve tracking a benchmark index rather than actively managing the portfolio. Tracking error can help in evaluating the success of these strategies by measuring the level of deviation from the benchmark index. A higher tracking error indicates a greater deviation from the benchmark index, while a lower tracking error indicates closer tracking. However, it is important to consider the level of risk taken to generate the tracking error, as higher tracking error can also indicate higher risk.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSecurity Characteristic Line\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t

              A security characteristic line (SCL) is a line that represents the relationship between the returns of an individual security and the returns of a market index. The SCL is a graphical representation of the security's sensitivity to market movements and is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) to calculate the security's beta.<\/p>\n

              The SCL is created by plotting the returns of the security against the returns of the market index over a period of time, typically using a scatter plot. The slope of the SCL represents the security's beta, which is a measure of the security's volatility relative to the market.<\/p>\n

              The SCL is a useful tool for investors and portfolio managers in evaluating the risk and return characteristics of individual securities and portfolios. It can help in identifying securities that are more or less sensitive to market movements, which can be useful in constructing a well-diversified portfolio that meets the investor's risk and return objectives.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

              In investment, risk metrics are quantitative measures used to evaluate and manage the potential risks associated with investing in various assets. These metrics help investors understand the level of risk they are taking on and make informed decisions about their investment portfolio.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3763","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"yoast_head":"\nHelp - Risk Metrics - Statmetrics<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Help - Risk Metrics - Statmetrics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In investment, risk metrics are quantitative measures used to evaluate and manage the potential risks associated with investing in various assets. These metrics help investors understand the level of risk they are taking on and make informed decisions about their investment portfolio.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Statmetrics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-07T16:20:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/logo-512.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"20 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/\",\"name\":\"Help - Risk Metrics - Statmetrics\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-17T22:24:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-07T16:20:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Help – Risk Metrics\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/\",\"name\":\"Statmetrics\",\"description\":\"Mobile App for Portfolio Analytics and Investment Management\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Statmetrics\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/logo-512.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/logo-512.png\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Statmetrics\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Statmetrics\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Help - Risk Metrics - Statmetrics","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Help - Risk Metrics - Statmetrics","og_description":"In investment, risk metrics are quantitative measures used to evaluate and manage the potential risks associated with investing in various assets. These metrics help investors understand the level of risk they are taking on and make informed decisions about their investment portfolio.","og_url":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/","og_site_name":"Statmetrics","article_modified_time":"2026-02-07T16:20:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/logo-512.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"20 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/","url":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/","name":"Help - Risk Metrics - Statmetrics","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-03-17T22:24:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-07T16:20:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/help-risk-metrics\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Help – Risk Metrics"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#website","url":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/","name":"Statmetrics","description":"Mobile App for Portfolio Analytics and Investment Management","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#organization","name":"Statmetrics","url":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/logo-512.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/logo-512.png","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Statmetrics"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Statmetrics"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3763"}],"version-history":[{"count":55,"href":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3763\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3992,"href":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3763\/revisions\/3992"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/statmetrics.org\/cms2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}